← Back to category

Cryotherapy vs Cancer

Inventor: Peter Littrup
Year: 2010
Device: Cryotherapy probe
Folder: littrup
Original: Open article
Confidence
0.90
Practicability
0.70
Evidence
0.60
Fringe Score
0.20
Risk
0.20
TRL
6

Goal

To destroy breast cancer tumors by minimally invasive freezing, providing a non-surgical treatment option.

Problem

Breast cancer tumors that require removal by surgery, causing discomfort and psychological impact.

Concept Summary

A cryotherapy system uses fine needles (cryoprobes) to deliver super-cold gas directly around a breast tumor, forming an ice-ball that freezes and kills cancer cells within minutes while preserving surrounding tissue.

Detailed Description

The system comprises multiple cryoprobes with a shaft that carries a cryogenic fluid (e.g., liquid nitrogen) to the distal tip. Flow-control valves and a compressor create a closed-loop system, regulated by a computer processor to achieve a high-power freeze followed by a low-power freeze. The ice-ball formed around the tumor causes cellular rupture and necrosis. Clinical trials on 13 patients showed no cancer recurrence over five years with minimal pain and scarring.

Principles

  • Cryogenic cooling
  • Minimally invasive ablation
  • Ice-ball formation

Scientific Domains

Medical physics Oncology Interventional radiology

Materials

  • Cryogenic gas (liquid nitrogen or argon)
  • Metallic cryoprobe shaft
  • Insulating vacuum jacket
  • Heat exchanger components

Mechanisms of Action

  • Rapid tissue freezing
  • Cellular rupture by ice crystal formation
  • Thermal ablation of tumor mass

Energy Sources

Electrical power for compressor and control electronics Cryogenic fluid stored under pressure

Applications

  • Breast cancer treatment
  • Ablation of other solid tumors (prostate, liver, lung, cervix)

Claimed Performance

Cancer cells destroyed within minutes of gas injection; patients remained cancer-free for up to five years with no significant complications.

Experimental Evidence

A clinical trial involving 13 breast-cancer patients who refused surgery; all remained cancer-free at five-year follow-up; minimal pain and scarring reported.

Replication Status

Results presented at the Society of Interventional Radiology 35th Annual Scientific Meeting; no independent replication reported.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (13 patients)
  • Limited to tumors accessible by percutaneous needles
  • Long-term comparative data vs. surgery lacking

Red Flags

  • Potential damage to surrounding healthy tissue if ice-ball over-extends
  • Need for precise imaging guidance

Keywords

cryotherapy breast cancer minimally invasive cryoprobe ice-ball ablation interventional radiology

Related Technologies

Laser tumor ablation Radiofrequency ablation High-intensity focused ultrasound

📷 Images

0logo.gif
0logo.gif
au922-4.jpg
au922-4.jpg
au922-4abc.jpg
au922-4abc.jpg
us7128738.jpg
us7128738.jpg
us9113.jpg
us9113.jpg
wo9067.jpg
wo9067.jpg
wo9131.jpg
wo9131.jpg