← Back to category

Constant Velocity Universal Joint

Inventor: Glenn Thompson
Year: 2006
Device: Thompson Coupling
Folder: thompson
Original: Open article
Confidence
0.90
Practicability
0.85
Evidence
0.50
Fringe Score
0.10
Risk
0.10
TRL
7

Goal

Reduce fuel consumption and vibration by providing a smooth, durable, and efficient constant-velocity universal joint.

Problem

Traditional Cardan joints cause sinusoidal speed fluctuations, vibration, wear, and friction, especially under axial and radial loads.

Concept Summary

The Thompson Coupling is a constant-velocity universal joint formed by two coaxial Cardan joints whose cruciform members are linked by a spherical four-bar (draglink) mechanism. All loads are carried by roller bearings; there are no sliding surfaces. The draglink constrains the trunnions to lie on the homokinetic plane, delivering true constant angular velocity, axial/radial load capacity, and unlimited torque capability without special lubrication or dust boots.

Principles

  • Constant-velocity transmission
  • Homokinetic plane constraint
  • Spherical four-bar linkage
  • Roller bearing load carriage
  • Gimbal mechanism

Scientific Domains

Mechanical Engineering Kinematics Materials Science

Materials

  • Steel
  • Cast iron
  • Bearing steel

Mechanisms of Action

  • Roller bearings carry radial, axial, and torque loads
  • Spherical draglink forces trunnions onto the homokinetic plane
  • Gimbal arrangement maintains equal instantaneous angular velocities

Applications

  • automotive drivetrains
  • marine propeller shafts
  • agricultural machinery
  • aviation gearboxes
  • trucking

Claimed Performance

Smooth, powerful, durable and efficient operation with no torque limitation, reduced bulk, and lower fuel consumption due to higher efficiency.

Experimental Evidence

Testing carried out at the Thompson Couplings test factory in Orange has confirmed the product has many advantages over existing commercial CV couplings and universal joints.

Replication Status

Testing performed at company test factory; no independent replication reported.

Limitations

  • Requires precision bearing manufacturing
  • Potentially heavier than some conventional CV joints
  • No quantified fuel-saving data

Red Flags

  • Fuel-saving claims are not quantified
  • No independent verification of performance

Keywords

constant velocity joint universal joint roller bearings spherical linkage Thompson coupling fuel efficiency mechanical coupling

Related Technologies

Cardan joint Rzeppa joint double Cardan joint constant velocity joint spherical four-bar linkage

📷 Images

0logo.gif
0logo.gif
fig1.jpg
fig1.jpg
fig10.jpg
fig10.jpg
fig11.jpg
fig11.jpg
fig12.jpg
fig12.jpg
fig13.jpg
fig13.jpg
fig14-12-15.jpg
fig14-12-15.jpg
fig14-123.jpg
fig14-123.jpg
fig14-16-19.jpg
fig14-16-19.jpg
fig14-20.jpg
fig14-20.jpg
fig14-4.jpg
fig14-4.jpg
fig14-7-11.jpg
fig14-7-11.jpg
fig14.5.jpg
fig14.5.jpg
fig14.6.jpg
fig14.6.jpg
fig15-1-4.jpg
fig15-1-4.jpg
fig16-11-12.jpg
fig16-11-12.jpg
fig16-13-14.jpg
fig16-13-14.jpg
fig16-2.jpg
fig16-2.jpg
fig16-7-8.jpg
fig16-7-8.jpg
fig16-9-10.jpg
fig16-9-10.jpg
fig16.1.jpg
fig16.1.jpg
fig17-1-2.jpg
fig17-1-2.jpg
fig17-3-4.jpg
fig17-3-4.jpg
fig17-5-7.jpg
fig17-5-7.jpg
fig17-8-9.jpg
fig17-8-9.jpg
fig18-1-3.jpg
fig18-1-3.jpg
fig18-10-11.jpg
fig18-10-11.jpg
fig18-12-13.jpg
fig18-12-13.jpg
fig18-4-7.jpg
fig18-4-7.jpg
fig18-8-9.jpg
fig18-8-9.jpg
fig2.jpg
fig2.jpg
fig20.1a-1e.jpg
fig20.1a-1e.jpg
fig20.2a-2b.jpg
fig20.2a-2b.jpg
fig20.3-5.jpg
fig20.3-5.jpg
fig20.6-8.jpg
fig20.6-8.jpg
fig20.9.jpg
fig20.9.jpg
fig21.1-2.jpg
fig21.1-2.jpg
fig21.3-4.jpg
fig21.3-4.jpg
fig21.5.jpg
fig21.5.jpg
fig22.1-2.jpg
fig22.1-2.jpg
fig22.3.jpg
fig22.3.jpg
fig22.4-5.jpg
fig22.4-5.jpg
fig22.6.jpg
fig22.6.jpg
fig22.7.jpg
fig22.7.jpg
fig23.jpg
fig23.jpg
fig3.jpg
fig3.jpg
fig4.jpg
fig4.jpg
fig5.jpg
fig5.jpg
fig6.jpg
fig6.jpg
fig7.jpg
fig7.jpg
fig8.jpg
fig8.jpg
fig9.jpg
fig9.jpg
image57i.jpg
image57i.jpg