Wallace Minto: Hydronic Radiation Transmitter

![](0logo.gif)  
**[rexresearch.com](../index.htm)**

---

**Wallace MINTO**

**Hydronic Radiation Transmitter**

---



---

***Radio-Electronics* (May, 1967), p. 37-38.**

**Build a Hydronic-Radiation Transmitter**

**by** **Jack Althouse**

Scientists in Florida have discovered a new form of
electromagnetic radiation which propagates under water as well
as radio does in air.

I must protest. Has a serious trade journal resorted to
sensationalism? It appears that either that either a hoax is
being perpetrated or that.

A new mode of communications --- via underwater
electromagnetic radiation --- is being explored by Hydronics
Corp. Wallace Minto, inventor of the system, says signals have
been transmitted over a distance as great as 30 miles by this
method..

Is hydronic radiation a fact or a fraud? It has raised a
storm of controversy as illustrated by the quotations above, all
of which were written by responsible engineers or technical
writers. The fact is that hydronic radiation does work. And the
equipment is easy to build once a basic understanding of the new
concept is attained.

But first, lets see how the systems inventor describes
hydronic radiation. Wallace Minto of Sarasota, FL, desribes it
as a new vector field related to the electromagnetic and
magnetohydrodynamic forces, characteristically propagated
through a water medium and associated with electronic
oscillations. Translation: Hydronic radiation is the same as
radio, except that it works through water instead of air.

Only the antennas distinguish the hydronic-radiation system
from a conventional radio system. Receiving and transmitting
antennas both have large plates, at each end of an
insulating  separator, to make contact with the water. A
half-wave radio antenna has insulators on each end and radiates
at right angles to the wire, as shown in Fig. 1-A. The hydronic
radiation antenna appears to radiate off the ends of its plates
(Fig. 1-B).

Early hydronic radiation experiments were made in the salt
water of the Atlantic Ocean, and its in the oceans that the
most exciting possibilities for hydronic radiation systems
exist. Static-free communication between ships, dependable
communication with submarines, and trans-Atlantic communication
without cables have all been suggested by the concepts
proponents.

But hydronic radiation also works through the fresh water found
in lakes and rivers. As a matter of fact, the transmitter
described here can be used in ordinary tap water to perform
experiments in your bathtub.

When working in water, its dangerous to use AC-powered
equipment; the transmitter, therefore, is designed to operate
from a 9-volt transistor radio battery. Power drain is low, and
the battery will last for many hours. The transmitter schematic
is shown in Fig. 2. Q1 is the rf oscillator, tuned by L1 to
transmit in the standard broadcast band, allowing use of an
ordinary transistor-type AM radio as a receiver. Q2 is an audio
oscillator, operating at about 1 KHz, which modulates Q1 through
transformer T. The tone-modulated signal stands out clearly
among the regular stations and thus makes testing easier.

The transmitter is built in a 5 x 7 x 3-inch aluminum box, with
all components mounted on a perforated board except for L1 and
the terminal strip. These are mounted on one end of the box.
Standard construction techniques are used. And parts placement
and lead length are not critical.

L1 is modified by winding a 25-turn coupling coil at its lower
end. The two terminal marked TRANSMIT are used as the on-off
switch. When the terminals are connected by a shorting wire, the
transmitter will operate.

To test the transmitter, leave the box open and place a
transistor radio next to the circuit board. Tune across the band
and listen for the modulated tone signal. It should appear
between 550 and 800 KHz. If you cant find it, set the receiver
dial at 550 KHz and tune L1 until the tone is received.

The transistor radio becomes our hydronic radiation receiver
with a simple modification. Open the case and wind 25 turns of
No. 24 enameled wire around it ferrite-loop antenna. Leave about
6 inches of wire at each end of the winding and twist the ends
together to hold the winding in place. Bring the wires out of
the case and snap the cover shut to hold them in place.

Two identical antennas are needed, one for the transmitter and
one for the receiver. Fig. 3 illustrates the simple
construction. End plates are 2 inches square, of 18-gauge brass
cleaned to the bare metal to make good contact with the water.
The 6-inch spacer can be of Bakelite, Lucite or other insulating
material.

Two 6-foot lengths of plastic-insulated hookup wire are used
for the feeder. One wire is connected to each plate by a solder
lug passed over the end of the plate, then fed through holes in
the spacer which allow the wires to be stretched taut. The rest
of the wire is twisted together to make a balanced feed line.

Strip the enamel insulation from the ends of the antenna-feeder
wires and from the two receiver leads, then solder them
together. Tape the connections to prevent shorting.

Connect the second antenna to the transmitter. Place the
antennas close together and check to see that the tone-modulated
signal can still be heard at 550 KHz. Adjust L1 if necessary.

Final equipment checks should be made with the antenna in the
water. A pool of water at least the size of a bathtub is needed,
and the water should be a foot or more deep. Place the antennas
facing each other about 3 feet apart. Retune the receiver to
find the tone. It will appear at about 700 KHz (the water loads
the transmitter heavily and shifts its frequency).

To make sure that the hydronic radiation signals are being
received through the water, lift the receiving antenna out of
the water. The signal should disappear or at least drop
considerably in volume.

With the gear ready, we can perform a few experiments, to see
how the system operates. A few questions may be answered, and a
few more may be raised.

**Hydronic-Radiation Experiments**

 One of the interesting characteristics of a hydronic
radiation communications system is the apparent directional
pattern of its antennas.

Place the antenna underwater with the end plates parallel to
each other. Rotate one antenna 90 deg horizontally or vertically so
the edges o its end plates are perpendicular to the other
antennas end plates. The signal will fade as you rotate,
disappearing completely at the 90 deg position. As you turn toward
180 deg , the signal will come back and become strong again as the
end plates once again become parallel. This experiment appears
to show that the antennas radiate off the ends of the plates.

Antenna engineers, however, say, No. The signal does not
radiate from the surface of the plates. Instead, they explain,
the signal radiates from the wires that connect the plates.
These wires actually form a dipole antenna; the plates, they
say, are just ground rods. Furthermore, the signals so not go
straight through the water at all. They travel from the
transmitting antenna upward to the surface of the water, along
the surface, then back down to the receiving antenna.

This description of hydronic radiation suggests that the
behavior of signal radiation is opposed to our general
experience. It is true that a horizontal-wire antenna will
radiate its signal upward. The up-over-down theory implies that
when hydronic waves reach the surface of the water, they must
bend at right angles to travel along the surface. Then, when
they are above the receiving antenna, they must bend downward to
the antenna can pick them up.

**Long-Range Antennas**

The maximum distance for effective communication by hydronic
radiation depends on the spacing between the antenna plates. The
greater the spacing, the longer the range. Plate spacings of
1,000 feet have been used to communicate over several miles.

For our experiment, a plate spacing of 6 feet is convenient and
will provide a range of 100 feet or  more. The antenna will
use a 6-foot 2 x 3 wood spacer and 1-foot square brass plates.
The plates dont have to be that big, but they must be heavy
enough so the antenna will sink in the water (the wood spacer
tends to float, of course). A good electrical connection is made
to each plate, the connecting wires are brought directly to the
center of the antenna and twisted to form the transmission line,
which should be about 15 feet long. As before, two identical
antennas are required.

**Up-Over-Down Experiment**

The antennas should be placed about 50 feet apart in water at
least 6 feet deep. With the antennas just below the surface and
pointed at each other, the signal should be received loud and
clear. Now, if both antennas are slowly lowered deeper into the
water, the distance between them being kept the same, we observe
an interesting result. The deeper the antennas go, the weaker
the signal becomes. If we put the antennas deep enough, the
signal disappears completely. Since the distance between the end
plates hasnt changed, we would expect the signal to become
weaker as the antennas go deeper into the water. Since the
signal is, in fact, weaker with the antennas deeply submerged,
our experiment shows that the antenna engineers are right. The
signal probably does go up-over-down.

**Future of Hydronic Radiation**

One experiment seems to prove that hydronic radiation travels
off the ends of the antenna plates. Another seems to prove the
signal somehow goes up-over-down. Is there an experiment that
could prove that neither explanation is correct? If so,
engineers havent discovered it. But there is no reason you
cant experiment with your radiation transmitter to see what
conclusions might be drawn. After all, the las word on the
concept isnt in yet.

So far, experimenters are strongly divided on whether hydronic
radiation actually is a different form of electromagnetic
radiation that will prove useful in underwater communication
systems. One cap holds that rf energy generated by the hydronic
transmitter is radiated through water in much the same manner as
it would be through the air, though with some differences.
Obviously the circuits employed are identical in equipment used
for both propagation media: air and water. The second group
feels that there is some basically different phenomenon at work,
one that promises efficient underwater communication.

Only extensive experimentation under carefully controlled
conditions will provide the complete answer, of course. But, you
can explore a phenomenon thats in the news today, and do it
with very little cash outlay. The hydronic transmitter does
work; why it does isnt apparent, at the moment.

---



![](hydron1.jpg)

![](hydron2.jpg)

---