Lewis Larsen, et al. -- LENR ( Cold Fusion ) Battery


  

![](0logo.gif)

[rexresearch.com](../index.htm)

---

Lewis
LARSEN, et
al.  
LENR ( Cold Fusion )

---

<http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0704140065apr16,0,1831279.story?coll=chi-business-hed>   
( April 16, 2007 )

#### 

# Nuclear Reactions May Produce Phones' Power

For several years a Chicago
entrepreneur has labored quietly building a company to create an
alternative to batteries for powering cell phones and other
small gadgets.  
  
The company, Lattice Energy LLC, deliberately kept a low profile
because its core technology, first called cold fusion 18 years
ago, has long been ridiculed by mainstream scientists. Lewis
Larsen, Lattice's founder, didn't want his enterprise tainted by
the empty promises of unlimited cheap energy surrounding cold
fusion.  
  
Larsen, who has had careers in investment banking and
consulting, has worked with many scientists doing experiments
with what now is called low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR)
rather than cold fusion. Even with the name change, he said,
many scientists mistakenly still believe they are creating
nuclear fusion in a bottle when they thrust palladium or other
metals into heavy water and add energy.  
  
"A lot of people are doing very good chemistry experiments, but
they don't understand what's happening," Larsen said. "They
write fine papers but then add foolish speculation."  
  
A few years ago Larsen began collaborating with a theoretical
physicist, professor Allan Widom of Northeastern University in
Boston, to help him understand why LENR experiments often give
off heat and charged particles.  
  
Before taking on the assignment, Widom was a skeptic, but Larsen
showed him enough experimental results from laboratories in
Russia, China and Japan, as well as the U.S., to convince him
that something important was happening.  
  
The problem soon became apparent to Widom: The experimenters
were convinced that atoms of a form of hydrogen called deuterium
were fusing together to form helium.  
  
"That kind of fusion requires very high temperatures," Widom
said.  
  
Rather than look for other explanations, most experimenters
preferred to invent new laws of physics to account for cold
fusion, Widom said. But instead of a strong nuclear force like
fusion at work, he concluded that a weak force was at the core of the experimental
results. Electrons were combining with protons to form
neutrons, giving off energy in the process.  
  
The entrepreneur and the professor have published their
Widom-Larsen theory of low-energy nuclear reactions and have
been meeting with business executives and government officials
to build credibility for their ideas.  
  
"Our model invokes no new physics," said Widom. "Everything
we've done conforms to the Standard Model's predictions for weak
interactions."  
  
With advances in nanotechnology, Larsen predicts it will become
practical to design devices using LENR to power cell phones that
can last 500 hours. The technology also might be used to produce
power in other settings, but Larsen said, "We're going for the
best available market with lots of demand, and that's electronic
mobile devices."  
  
Larsen, who has competitors domestically and abroad also working
on the problem, predicts that within five years there will be
power sources based on LENR technology.

#### --- Patents

Lewis LARSEN

WO2004103036   
ELECTRODE CONSTRUCTS INCLUDING MODIFIED METAL LAYERS, AND RELATED
CELLS AND METHODS

Inventor: LARSEN LEWIS G   
Abstract -- Described are
electrode devices for electrical cells and other similar
multilayer thin film devices, including a substrate and a
multilayer working structure bonded to the substrate. In one
embodiment, the multilayer working structure includes at least one
metal layer and at least one metal oxide layer. In another
embodiment, the multilayer working structure includes at least one
layer comprising an alloy of tin. Also described are related
apparatuses and methods employing these devices.

USP # 6921469 // WO03083965  
ELECTRODE CONSTRUCTS, AND RELATED
CELLS AND METHODS

![](us1.jpg)  
  
![](us2.jpg)  
  
![](us3.jpg)

---

LATTICE ENERGY LLC APPLICANT

EP1257688
  
ELECTRICAL CELLS, COMPONENTS AND
METHODS

Inventor: MILEY GEORGE H   
Applicant: MILEY GEORGE H (US)   
EC:  H01L35/00  IPC: C23C28/00; G21B3/00; H01L35/00
(+12)

US6599404
  
Flake-resistant multilayer
thin-film electrodes and electrolytic cells ...

Inventor: MILEY GEORGE H   
Applicant: LATTICE ENERGY LLC (US)   
EC:  C25D17/10; G21B3/00  IPC: C25D17/10; G21B3/00;
C25D17/10

---

Alan WIDOM & Lewis LARSEN

WO2007030740   
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR
ABSORPTION OF INCIDENT GAMMA RADIATION AND ITS CONVERSION TO
OUTGOING RADIATION AT LESS PENETRATING, LOWER ENERGIES AND
FREQUENCIES

Inventor: LARSEN LEWIS G (US); WIDOM
ALLAN

WO2006119080
  
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR
GENERATION OF ULTRA LOW MOMENTUM NEUTRONS

Inventor: LARSEN LEWIS G (US); WIDOM
ALAN

---

**Adapted from :**[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcare-lenrs-occurring-in-compact-fluorescent-lightsmarch-7-2013**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcare-lenrs-occurring-in-compact-fluorescent-lightsmarch-7-2013)**Lattice Energy LLC****Contact: 1-312-861-0115** **lewisglarsen@gmail.com** **http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen**

**Are LENRs Occurring in Compact Fluorescent
Lights**  
  
**by**  
  
**Lewis Larsen**  
**President and CEO at Lattice Energy LLC**

  
1. Low energy neutron reactions (LENRs) Neutron-catalyzed LENR
transmutations can alter Mercury isotopes Mead et al. reported
inexplicable Hg isotope shifts in compact fluorescent lights LENRs
may be occurring at very low rates during everyday operation of
CFLs Technical Comments Lewis Larsen President and CEO Lattice
Energy LLC March 7, 2013 Stable 80Hg198 target Series of
intermediate Hg isotope shifts Stable 82Pbisotopes +nulm
Widom-Larsen LENR network Neutron-catalyzed transmutations
Neutron-catalyzed transmutations?  
  
2. Cite and discuss outstanding new experimental paper by Mead et
al. (Environmental Science and Technology, Feb. 2013) in which
they report measurements of anomalous shifts in Mercury isotopes
found in household compact fluorescent lights (CFLs); according to
the papers authors, a portion of these observed shifts are simply
not explainable with well-known MDF or MIF mechanisms for prosaic
chemical fractionation. Examine strong possibility that some
indeterminate percentage of isotopic shift anomalies present in
Mead et al.s new data could potentially have been caused by low
energy neutron reactions (LENRs) occurring at extremely low rates
somewhere inside CF lights during normal operation; this would be
an unexpected, surprising discovery. Discuss additional types of
measurements that experimentalists could make on such CFLs (SIMS,
solid-state NMR, etc.) to unambiguously determine: (1) whether
LENRs are occurring therein; (2) if so, at exactly what locations
inside the lights; (3) at what reaction rates; and (4) what
percentage of observed shifts in Mercury isotopes might reasonably
be attributed to LENR transmutations vs. prosaic chemical
fractionation processes? LENRs dont produce hard radiation or
long-lived wastes Thus can be hidden in plain sight and occur in
many surprising places Subtle isotopic traces of LENRs can readily
be observed with mass spectroscopy Main points in this
presentation  
  
4. False-color image of surface plasmon excitation on substrate  
[**http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/~exter/research.htm**](http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eexter/research.htm)  
For copy of informative Nature article by Exter re quantum
entanglement of surface plasmons, see:   
[**http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/~exter/articles/nature.pdf**](http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eexter/articles/nature.pdf)  
5. Unique Hg stable isotope signatures of compact fluorescent
lamp-sourced Hg   
C. Mead, J. Lyons, T. Johnson, and D. Anbar Environmental Science
& Technology   
DOI: 10.1021/es303940p   
Reported inexplicable shifts of Mercury isotopes in consumer lamps
  
[**http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es303940p**](http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es303940p)  
Quoting abstract directly: The recent widespread adoption of
compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) has increased their importance as
a source of environmental Hg. Stable isotope analysis can identify
the sources of environmental Hg, but the isotopic composition of
Hg from CFL is not yet known. Results from analyses of CFL with a
range of hours of use show that the Hg they contain is
isotopically fractionated in a unique pattern during normal CFL
operation. This fractionation is large by comparison to other
known fractionating processes for Hg and has a distinctive,
mass-independent signature, such that CFL Hg could be uniquely
identified from other sources. The fractionation process described
here may also explain anomalous fractionation of Hg isotopes in
precipitation. Direct quotes selected from body of paper:
Trapped Hg of used CFL show unusually large isotopic
fractionation, the pattern of which is entirely different from
that which has been observed in previous Hg isotope research aside
from intentional isotope enrichment. Most notably, there is no
straightforward relationship between extent of fractionation and
isotope mass. Thus, while previous studies of MIF of Hg only
observed large deviations from mass- dependence in odd mass
isotopes, our results clearly show MIF across multiple even mass
and odd mass isotopes. Fig. shows large deviations from MDF and
unused samples  
  
6. A. Widom and L. Larsen  : Ultra low momentum neutron
catalyzed nuclear reactions on metallic hydride surfaces   
European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields 46 pp. 107 -
112 (2006)  
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/widom-and-larsen-ulm-neutron-catalyzed-lenrs-on-metallic-hydride-surfacesepjc-march-2006**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/widom-and-larsen-ulm-neutron-catalyzed-lenrs-on-metallic-hydride-surfacesepjc-march-2006)  
Absorption of nuclear gamma radiation by heavy electrons on
metallic hydride surfaces   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0509/0509269v1.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0509/0509269v1.pdf)  
Widom and Larsen : Nuclear abundances in metallic hydride
electrodes of electrolytic chemical cells   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0602/0602472v1.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0602/0602472v1.pdf)  
Widom and Larsen : Theoretical Standard Model rates of proton to
neutron conversions near metallic hydride surfaces
http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/nucl-th/pdf/0608/0608059v2.pdf  
  
Widom and Larsen : Energetic electrons and nuclear transmutations
in exploding wires   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/arxiv/pdf/0709/0709.1222v1.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0709/0709.1222v1.pdf)  
Widom, Srivastava, and Larsen : Errors in the quantum
electrodynamic mass analysis of Hagelstein and Chaudhary   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.0466v2.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.0466v2.pdf)  
Widom, Srivastava, and Larsen : High energy particles in the
solar corona   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.2647v1.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.2647v1.pdf)  
Widom, Srivastava, and Larsen : A primer for electro-weak induced
low energy nuclear reactions   
Pramana - Journal of Physics 75 pp. 617 - 637 (2010) Y.
Srivastava, A. Widom, and L. Larsen   
[**http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v75/p617/fulltext.pdf**](http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v75/p617/fulltext.pdf)  
  
Erroneous wave functions of Ciuchi et al. for collective modes in
neutron production on metallic hydride cathodes   
[**http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.5212v1.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.5212v1.pdf)  
(v1 Oct. 17, 2012)  
  
7. LENRs in catalytic converters: are green LENRs occurring in
common devices? L. Larsen, June 25, 2010 [76 PowerPoint slides]   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-len-rs-in-catalytic-convertersjune-25-2010**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-len-rs-in-catalytic-convertersjune-25-2010)  
Note: discuss mass spectroscopy data indicating LENRs could be
occurring at very low rates therein   
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and LENRs L. Larsen,
November 25, 2009 [61 PowerPoint slides]   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewpahs-and-lenrsnov-25-2009**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewpahs-and-lenrsnov-25-2009)  
Note: shows how LENRs can be triggered on aromatic Carbon rings
with just temperature, pressure, time   
Neutron-catalyzed LENR transmutations produce Gold from Tungsten;
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries presents new data at Winter ANS
meeting L. Larsen, December 7, 2012 [29 PowerPoint slides]   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-lenr-transmutation-networks-can-produce-golddec-7-2012**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-lenr-transmutation-networks-can-produce-golddec-7-2012)  
Note: Mitsubishi reported experimental data; confirms W-L LENR
network pathway: W → Re → Os → Ir → Pt → Au   
Surface plasmons on Graphene are confirmed L. Larsen, July 6,
2012 [64 PowerPoint slides]   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-on-hydrogenated-fullerenes-and-graphenejuly-6-2012**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-on-hydrogenated-fullerenes-and-graphenejuly-6-2012)  
Note: discuss confirmation of surface plasmons on Graphene; LENRs
in electric arcs w. Carbon electrodes in H2O   
Index to key concepts and documents L. Larsen, Version #19,
updated through August 19, 2014 [119 PowerPoint slides]   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-index-to-documents-re-widomlarsen-theory-of-lenrsmay-28-2013**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-index-to-documents-re-widomlarsen-theory-of-lenrsmay-28-2013)  
Note: provides title, description, and URL for many online
documents about Widom-Larsen theory, LENRs, and Lattice  
  
9. We have now not only traversed the region of the pure
understanding and carefully surveyed every part of it, but we have
also measured it, and assigned to everything therein its proper
place. But this land is an island, and enclosed by Nature herself
within unchangeable limits. It is the land of truth (an attractive
word), surrounded by a wide and stormy ocean, the region of
illusion, where many a fog-bank, many an iceberg, seems to the
mariner, on his voyage of discovery, a new country, and, while
constantly deluding him with vain hopes, engages him in dangerous
adventures, from which he never can desist, and which yet he never
can bring to a termination. But before venturing upon this sea, in
order to explore it in its whole extent, and to arrive at a
certainty whether anything is to be discovered there, it will not
be without advantage if we cast our eyes upon the chart of the
land that we are about to leave, and to ask ourselves, firstly,
whether we cannot rest perfectly contented with what it contains,
or whether we must not of necessity be contented with it, if we
can find nowhere else a solid foundation to build upon; and,
secondly, by what title we possess this land itself, and how we
hold it secure against all hostile claims? Immanuel Kant, The
Critique of Pure Reason (1781) Kant comments on search for truth
in the advancement of science Modern nuclear alchemy al la
Widom-Larsen.  
  
10.Modern nuclear alchemy al la Widom-Larsen. Nuclear and chemical
energy realms can interconnect in small regions  1. Since the
inception of modern nuclear science in ~1940s, it has been widely
believed that the only nuclear processes suitable for commercial
power generation were strong interaction fission or fusion; it was
also thought that nuclear transmutation reactions could only
happen in certain environments, e.g., fission reactors, nuclear
weapons, or stars. Pons & Fleischmanns 1989 discovery of
seemingly nuclear processes operating inside what would otherwise
be ordinary D2O electrolytic chemical cells challenged long-
established conceptual paradigms about nuclear physics. Initially,
P&F rashly speculated that their observed radiation-free
excess heat resulted from some sort of a D+D cold fusion
process. That totally erroneous theoretical idea, coupled with
then-irreproducible experimental results, resulted in deep
skepticism about LENRs by mainstream scientists that has persisted
to the present. Starting with release of our first arXiv preprint
in 2005, the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs has shown, using known
physics, how energetic nuclear reactions can occur in ordinary
chemical cells. Per W-L, key aspects of LENRs involve weak
interactions that can occur in a variety of different environments
under relatively mild physical conditions. Our theory posits that
in condensed matter systems, many-body collective quantum effects
allow otherwise disparate chemical and nuclear energy realms to
briefly interconnect in special nm- to micron-scale regions on
surfaces. 1. Rudyard Kipling, The Battle of East and West (1889)  
  
11. The neutron plays a pivotal role in manmade transmutations.
In the words of Bronowski, At twilight on the sixth day of
Creation, so say the Hebrew commentators to the Old Testament, God
made for man a number of tools that gave him also the gift of
creation. If the commentators were alive today, they would write,
God made the neutron. Is it far-fetched to consider the neutron
to be the Stone of the Philosophers (and atom smashers to be
athanors  the furnaces of the Philosophic Egg)? Frankly, yes.
But, in 1941, fast neutrons were used to transmute mercury into a
tiny quantity of gold1.. Was the age old dream realized? Would a
modern day version of the Roman Emperor Diocletian have to burn
all the notebooks and journal articles and destroy the atom
smashers in order to protect the worlds currency? Well, probably
not. It is likely that an ounce of such gold would cost more than
the net worth of the planet. Also, the gold so obtained is
radioactive and lives for only a few days at most. But, we are not
always logical when it comes to gold. In the words of Black Elk, a
holy man of the Oglala Lakota-Sioux on the Pine Ridge Reservation
in South Dakota, Our people knew there was yellow metal in little
chunks up there, but they did not bother with it, because it was
not good for anything. 1. Sherr et al., The Physical Review 60
pp. 473 - 479 (1941) Arthur Greenberg, From Alchemy to Chemistry
in Picture and Story pp. 571 2007 Modern nuclear alchemy al la
Widom-Larsen Uncharged neutrons play a crucial role in modern
transmutation 1941: US nuclear physicists realized an age-old
dream of the ancient alchemists  
  
12.  Ultra low energy neutrons play key role in LENR
transmutations Widom-Larsen breakthrough theory based on
well-accepted nuclear science Alchemy, derived from the Arabic
word al-kimia is both a philosophy and an ancient practice
focused on the attempt to change base metals into gold,
investigating the preparation of the elixir of longevity, and
achieving ultimate wisdom, involving the improvement of the
alchemist as well as the making of several substances described as
possessing unusual properties. The practical aspect of alchemy
generated the basics of modern inorganic chemistry, namely
concerning procedures, equipment and the identification and use of
many current substances. Alchemy has been practiced in ancient
Egypt, Mesopotamia (modern Iraq), India (modern Indian
subcontinent), Persia (modern Iran), China, Japan, Korea, the
classical Greco-Roman world, the medieval Islamic world, and then
medieval Europe up to the 20th century, in a complex network of
schools and philosophical systems spanning at least 2,500 years.
Source for above quote: Wikipedia article as of July 7, 2010
According to the WLT, LENRs and chemistry intersect on nm - μ
length-scales in condensed matter systems under comparatively
mild conditions compared to interiors of stars, nuclear weapons,
and fuel rods of operating fission reactors. Production of gold
from lower-Z elements such as Tungsten (W) is not just some
alchemists fevered delusion. It is an understandable result of
ULM neutron-captures on W and subsequent beta decays, both of
which are presently well-accepted in mainstream nuclear science
Popular Science magazine, March 1948 US Atomic Energy Commission
(AEC) produced Gold  
  
17. Overview: Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs LENR-active surface
sites in condensed matter are not permanent entities or static
structures; in fact, they are extraordinarily dynamic, short
lived, many-body collective organizations of matter. In
experimental or certain natural systems with sufficient input
energy, when conditions are just right they will form
spontaneously, operate for as little as 10 ns up to perhaps
several hundred nanoseconds, and then suddenly die (they
effectively destroy themselves with heat). Over time or the course
of a given experiment, many cycles of birth, nuclear binding
energy release, and death may be repeated over and over again at
many different, randomly scattered nm-to μm-sized locations found
on an LENR-active surface or interface; neutron-dose histories can
vary greatly over small length-scales across an entire LENR-active
surface. Such spatial elemental/isotopic heterogeneity has often
been observed by LENR researchers with SIMS. While ULM neutron
production and local capture, gamma conversion to IR by heavy
electrons, and subsequent nuclear decays are occurring, these tiny
patches temporarily become hot spots. Their temperatures may
briefly reach 4,000 - 6,000o K or perhaps even higher. That value
is roughly as high as the surface temperature of the Sun and hot
enough to melt and/or even flash-boil essentially all metals and
alloys, including Tungsten (b.p. 5,666o C). For a brief time, a
tiny dense ball of very hot, nanodusty plasma is created. Such
intense local heating events can produce various types of
distinctive explosive melting features and/or comparatively deep
craters that are often observed in post-experiment SEM images of
LENR device surfaces; for example, please see Zhang & Dashs
SEM-EDX image of such surface features on Slide #69 in   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewjune-25-2009**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewjune-25-2009)  
  
18. Unlike fission and fusion reactions, naturally occurring LENR
transmutation processes in condensed matter are biologically
benign because they make extensive use of and are enabled by
many-body collective effects, quantum phenomena, and the weak
interaction. As a result, they typically do not emit dangerous
high-energy gamma photon or neutron radiation, nor do they produce
large amounts of long-lived radioactive isotopes. LENRs are clean,
green, ubiquitous, and effectively hidden in plain sight; best way
to detect subtle effects of these processes is to analyze samples
with very sensitive mass spectroscopy. In a 2012 Lattice
PowerPoint presentation   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcnew-russian-data-supports-wlt-neutron-production-in-lightningapril-4-2012**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llcnew-russian-data-supports-wlt-neutron-production-in-lightningapril-4-2012)  
On Slide #68 we stated that, Recently, greatly increased use of
various types of mass spectroscopy by geochemists,
microbiologists, and environmental scientists has revealed that
the longstanding assumption of effective natural uniformity of
U238/U235 ratios across the earth is clearly erroneous;
importantly, present-era abiological and/or biologically mediated
processes appear to be responsible for such anomalous variances.
We concluded that key remaining questions were whether,  ...
anomalous variances in such isotopic ratios the result of purely
chemical fractionation process or processes of some sort, and/or
could they [alternatively] be caused by low energy nuclear
reactions (LENRs), either abiologically or somehow induced by the
actions of bacteria through some yet to be clarified mechanism? A
large array of additional measurements is obviously needed.
Absence of strong radiation signatures renders LENRs unnoticeable  
  
19. Metallic substrates: substantial quantities of Hydrogen
isotopes must be brought into intimate contact with fully-loaded
metallic hydride-forming metals; e.g., Palladium, Platinum,
Rhodium, Nickel, Titanium , Tungsten, etc.; please note that
collectively oscillating, very roughly 2-D surface plasmon (SP)
electrons are intrinsically present and cover exposed surfaces of
such metals. At full loading occupation of ionized Hydrogen at
interstitial sites in bulk metallic lattices, many- body,
collectively oscillating patches of protons (p+), deuterons (d+),
or tritons (t+) will then form spontaneously at random locations
scattered across metal hydrides surface interfaces; And/or
certain types of Carbon substrates: delocalized, many-body
collectively oscillating π electron clouds that comprise outer
covering surfaces of fullerenes, graphene, benzene, and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules behave very similarly to SPs;
when such Carbon-based molecules are hydrogenated (i.e.,
chemically protonated), they can create many-body, collectively
oscillating, Q-M entangled quantum systems that, in context of the
Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs, are functionally equivalent to and
behave dynamically like loaded metallic hydrides; Breakdown of
Born-Oppenheimer approximation: in both cases above, occurs in
tiny surface patches of contiguous collections of collectively
oscillating p+, d+, and/or t+ ions; enables E-M coupling between
nearby SP or alternatively delocalized π electrons and nearby
hydrogenous ions; patches create their own local nuclear-strength
electric fields; effective masses of coupled patch electrons are
then increased to a significant multiple of an electron at rest
(e- → e-\*) that is determined by required simultaneous energy
input(s); and Disequilibrium input energy: triggering LENRs
requires external non-equilibrium fluxes of charged particles or
electromagnetic (E-M) photons that transfer input energy directly
to many-body SP or π electron plasmonic surface films. Examples of
such external energy sources include (they may be used in
combination): electric currents (electron beams); E-M photons
(e.g., emitted from lasers, IR radiation from resonant E-M cavity
walls, etc.); pressure gradients of p+, d+, and/or t+ ions imposed
across surfaces; currents of other ions crossing the SP electron
surface film in either direction (ion beams); etc. Such sources
provide additional input energy required to surpass certain
minimum H-isotope-specific electron- mass thresholds that allow
production of ULM neutron fluxes via e-\* + p+, e-\* + d+, or e-\* +
t+ electroweak nuclear reactions. Following required to create
right conditions for LENR-active surfaces  
  
20. LENR hot spots create intense local heating and variety of
readily noticeable surface features such as craters: over time,
LENR-active surfaces inevitably experience major micron-scale
changes in local nanostructures and elemental/isotopic
compositions. On LENR-active substrate surfaces, there are a
myriad of different complex, nanometer-to micron-scale
electromagnetic, chemical, and nuclear processes that operate in
conjunction with and simultaneously with each other. LENRs involve
interactions between surface plasmon electrons, E-M fields, and
many different types of nanostructures with varied geometries,
surface locations relative to each other, different- strength
local E-M fields, and varied chemical/isotopic compositions;
chemical and nuclear realms interoperate, To varying degrees, many
of these complex, time-varying surface interactions are
electromagnetically coupled on many different physical
length-scales: thus, mutual E-M resonances can be very important
in such systems. In addition to optical frequencies, SP and π
electrons in condensed matter often also have some absorption and
emission bands in infrared (IR) and UV portions of E-M spectrum.
Well, walls of gas-phase metallic or glass LENR reaction vessels
can emit various wavelengths of E-M photon energy into the
interior space; glass tubes with inside surfaces coated with
complex phosphors can function as resonant E-M cavities. Target
nanostructures, nanoparticles, and/or molecules located inside
such cavities can absorb IR, UV, or visible photons radiated from
vessel walls if their absorption bands happen (or are engineered)
to fall into same spectral range as E-M cavity wall radiation
emission; complex two-way E-M interactions between targets and
walls occurs (imagine interior of a reaction vessel as arrays of
E-M nanoantennas with walls and targets having two-way
send/receive channels), Wide variety of complex, interrelated E-M,
nuclear, and chemical processes may be occurring simultaneously,
side-by-side in adjacent nm to μ-scale local regions on
LENR-active surfaces: for example, some regions on a given surface
may be absorbing E-M energy locally, while others nearby can be
emitting energy (e.g., as energetic electrons, photons, other
charged particles, etc.). At the very same time, energy can be
transferred laterally from regions of resonant absorption or
capture to other regions in which emission or consumption is
taking place, e.g., photon or electron emission, and/or LENRs in
which [E-M field energy] + e- → e-\* + p+ → nulm + ν LENR-active
surfaces host many dynamically interacting processes  
  
21.  Using conceptual insights provided by the WLT,
experimental conditions in condensed matter systems and dusty
plasmas can be technologically tweaked to increase rates of weak
reaction neutron production vastly above whatever levels might
ever be attainable in analogous systems found at random out in
Nature or the myriad of LENR laboratory experiments that have been
conducted to date, It is known within the field of LENRs that,
under exactly the right conditions and in a number of different
types of experimental systems (e.g., rare well-performing
current-driven aqueous H2O/D2O electrolytic chemical cells), rates
of transmutation product production (which according to WLT are
very closely related to parallel rates of many-body, collective
electroweak reaction ULM neutron production) can be quite
substantial. Measured indirectly via qualitative and quantitative
assays of LENR transmutation products, estimates of experimentally
observed, effectively neutron production rates reported by LENR
researchers range from ~109 - 1010 cm2/sec up to ~1012 - 1016
cm2/sec in a small subset of very well-performing experimental
systems. In 2007, Widom & Larsen published first-principles
calculations which show that substantial ULM neutron production
rates via such electroweak reactions are theoretically possible in
condensed matter systems under such mild conditions; calculated
results for such rates in a model electrolytic chemical cell (on
the order of 1012 to 1014 neutrons cm2/second) are thus in good
agreement with the best available published experimental data;
again please see arXiv preprint at:   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/nucl-th/pdf/0608/0608059v2.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/nucl-th/pdf/0608/0608059v2.pdf)  
Technologically, many-body collective electroweak neutron
production rates can be directly manipulated by: (1) controlling
total numbers and density of e-p+ pairs on a given surface (which
is ~equivalent to controlling the area-density and dimensions of
many- body, collectively oscillating surface patches of protons or
deuterons); and (2) controlling the rate and total quantity of
appropriate form(s) of nonequilibrium energy input into
LENR-active patches; appropriate forms of input energy can go
directly into high electric fields that bathe SP electrons in a
patch --- it determines the number and effective masses of e\*
electrons present in a given patch whose increased masses are at
values somewhere above the minimum mass-renormalization threshold
ratio, β0 that is required for initiating e\* + p+ or e\* + d+
electroweak neutron production reactions. The term (β - β0)2 in
our published LENR rate equation reflects the degree to which mass
renormalized e\* electrons in a given patch exceed the minimum
threshold ratio for electroweak neutron production β0. Rigorous
details of supporting calculations are explained in:   
[**http://arxiv.org/PS\_cache/nucl-th/pdf/0608/0608059v2.pdf**](http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/nucl-th/pdf/0608/0608059v2.pdf)  
LENR reaction rates can be increased by controlling key parameters
All other things being equal, the higher the density of e-p+
reactants and the greater the rate and quantity of appropriate
forms of nonequilibrium energy inputs, the higher the rate of ULM
neutron production in nm- to μ-scale LENR-active patches in an
appropriately pre-configured condensed matter system  
  
23. The delusion of transmutation As we peer down the vista of
the past we find the delusion of transmutation holding the most
prominent place in the minds of thinking men. Frenzied alchemy
held the world in its grip for seventeen centuries and more of
recorded history. This pseudoscience with its alluring goal and
fascinating mysticism dominated the thoughts and actions of
thousands. In the records of intellectual aberrations it holds a
unique position. Even Roger Bacon of Oxford, easily the most
learned man of his age, the monk who seven hundred years ago
foresaw such modern scientific inventions as the steamship and the
flying machine, believed in the possibility of solving this all-
consuming problem  Sir Isaac Newton, one of the clearest
scientific thinkers of all time, bought and consulted books on
alchemy as late as the eighteenth century  The power and the
influence of many of the alchemists can hardly be exaggerated 
While among the alchemists there were some genuine enthusiasts
like Bernard Trevisan, the annals of this queer practice are
filled with accounts of charlatans and spurious adepts who, with a
deluge of glib words but with only a drop of truth, turned alchemy
into one of the greatest popular frauds in history. Bernard
Jaffe, Crucibles: the story of chemistry 4th Revised ed., pp.
7-8 Dover 1976 Historical perspective: over 100 years of data
Alchemy was not always thought to be a questionable area of
inquiry  
  
24. "The Alchemist's Workshop" by Jan van der Straet (1570) "The
Alchymist in Search of the Philosophers' Stone Discovers
Phosphorousby Joseph Wright of Derby (1771) Historical
perspective: over 100 years of data 1901: Discovery of modern
nuclear alchemy by Soddy & Rutherford For Mikes sake Soddy,
dont call it transmutation. Theyll have our heads off as
alchemists. Comment made by Ernest Rutherford to Frederic Soddy
in 1901; Rutherford subsequently received Nobel prize in chemistry
in 1908 In 1901, twenty-four year-old chemist Frederick Soddy and
Ernest Rutherford were attempting to identify a mysterious gas
that wafted from samples of radioactive thorium oxide. They
suspected that this gas - they called it an emanation - held a
key to the recently discovered phenomenon of radioactivity. Soddy
had passed the puzzling gas over a series of powerful chemical
reagents, heated white-hot. When no reactions took place, he came
to a startling realization. As he told his biographer many years
later, 'I remember quite well standing there transfixed as though
stunned by the colossal import of the thing and blurting out-or so
it seemed at the time, Rutherford, this is transmutation: the
thorium is disintegrating and transmuting itself into argon gas.
Rutherfords reply was typically aware of more practical
implications. J. Magill, Decay Engine at   
[**http://www.nucleonica.net**](http://www.nucleonica.net)  
  
25. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1920:
Rutherford predicts neutron and its creation via electric
discharges On present views, the neutral hydrogen atom is
regarded as a nucleus of unit charge with an electron attached at
a distance, and the spectrum of hydrogen is ascribed to the
movements of this distant electron. Under some conditions however,
it may be possible for an electron to combine much more closely
with the H nucleus, forming a kind of neutral doublet [neutron].
Such an atom would have very novel properties. Its external field
would be practically zero, except very close to the nucleus, and
in consequence it should be able to move freely through matter.
Its presence would be difficult to detect by the spectroscope, and
it may be impossible to contain in in a sealed vessel. On the
other hand, it should enter readily the structure of atoms, and
may either unite with the nucleus [now called neutron capture] or
be disintegrated by its intense field, resulting in possibly the
escape of a charged H atom [now called proton emission] or an
electron [now called beta particle emission] or both. 2nd
Bakerian lecture was given in London on June 20, 1920 Nuclear
constitution of atoms Ernest Rutherford Proc. Roy. Soc. pp. 577 -
585 (1920)
http://web.ihep.su/dbserv/compas/src/rutherford20/eng.pdf Quoting
further (his next statement is utterly astounding): If the
existence of such atoms [he is referring to neutrons here] be
possible, it is to be expected that they may be produced, but
probably in only very small numbers, in the electric discharge
through hydrogen, where both electrons and H nuclei are present in
considerable numbers. It is the intention of this writer to make
experiments to test whether any indication of the production of
such atoms [read neutrons] can be obtained under these
conditions. Comment: Rutherford is saying that neutrons could be
produced by intense electric discharges in Hydrogen.  
  
26. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1922: Wendt
& Irion see Helium spectroscopically in exploding W wire
Experimental attempts to decompose Tungsten at high temperatures
This has become possible through the work of Anderson whose
method of exploding wires at temperatures above 20,000o, well
above that attributed to the hottest stars, has become valuable in
spectroscopy. In our application of this method the [Tungsten]
wires were exploded within strong glass bulbs so that the gaseous
products of the explosions could be collected for analysis. The
method thus includes factors, both of cause and of error,
analogous to those operative in the voluminous and inconclusive
controversy on the evolution of helium in various types of low
pressure discharge tubes, extending from 1903 to 1915. American
Chemical Society 44 pp. 1887 - 1894 (1922) Quoting further: The
bulb was then connected to the leads from the condenser through
the spark gap and the wire was exploded by closing the primary
circuit of the transformer. There was a delay of a fraction of a
second before the condenser was fully charged to the voltage used,
about 30,000, but thereafter the wire disappeared in a brilliant
flash  [conclusion] When fine Tungsten wires are exploded in a
vacuum at such temperatures, the spectrum of Helium appears in the
gases produced. Comment: Wendt & Irions results were
discredited by an attack that Rutherford published in Nature. This
stopped their work and effectively ended their careers. In 2006,
we reanalyzed their data in light of the Widom-Larsen theory and
discovered that their experimental results were most likely
correct and Rutherfords criticisms were wrong. Please see our
2007 arXiv preprint on exploding wires for details.  
  
27. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1923: after
winning Nobel prize, Millikan excited about transmutations As
early as 1912, Dr. Winchester and I thought we had good evidence
that we were knocking hydrogen out of aluminum and other metals by
very powerful electric discharges in vacuo  How much farther can
we go in this artificial transmutation of elements? This is one of
the supremely interesting problems of modern physics upon which we
are all assiduously working. Comment made on pp. 584 by Robert
Millikan, then at Caltech, as written in his Scribners magazine
article Gullivers travels in science Robert Millikan Scribners
pp. 577 - 585 (Nov. 1923)   
[**http://www.unz.org/Pub/Scribners-1923nov-00577**](http://www.unz.org/Pub/Scribners-1923nov-00577)  
Quoting further:  Has nature a way of making these
transmutations in her laboratories? She is doing it under our eyes
in the radioactive process  Does the process go on in both
directions, heavier atoms being continually formed, as well as
continually disintegrating into lighter ones? Not on earth, so far
as we can see. Perhaps in Gods laboratories, the stars. Some say
we shall be finding out.  
  
28. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1924: Soddy,
now famous, discusses new transmutation experiments Indeed, for
some time before Prof. Miethes announcement it has been clear to
me that, by passing a sufficiently high tension discharge though
mercury vapor, not merely that such a transmutation might occur,
but that it was inevitable, unless our present views on atomic
structure are radically at fault. Comment made by Soddy in Nature
article; had already received Nobel prize in chemistry in 1921
The reported Transmutation of Mercury into Gold Frederic Soddy
Nature 114 pp. 244 - 245 (1924)  
  
29. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1924: Gaschler
claims transmutation of Gold into Mercury with protons Der
zerfall des quecksilberatoms [Translated from German: The decay
of the Mercury atom] Alois Gaschler Summary: Gold was sealed into
vacuum tube and bombarded with protons; after 30 hours, Mercury
line appeared in spectrum and became progressively stronger over
time. Oil pump used to produce vacuum - hydrocarbons were likely
present on the Gold Angewandte Chemie 37 pp. 666 - 667 (1924) now
online at:   
[**http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ange.v37:35/issuetoc**](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ange.v37:35/issuetoc)  
Gold changed to Mercury by German physicist Journal of Chemical
Education 3 pp. 679 (1926) DOI: 10.1021/ed003p679   
Also see: Comment: Gaschler was also issued U.S. patent on
transmutation- related novel subject matter art as follows: US
Patent # 1,644,370 Method of Artificially Producing Radioactive
Substances Oct. 4, 1927 [filed September 4, 1924]   
[**http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1644370.pdf**](http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1644370.pdf)  
Claim #5: A process for increasing radioactivity of materials
which comprises vaporizing said materials by heating said
materials to a high temperature by means of a current of low
voltage and high intensity and submitting said vapors to contact
with relatively large electrodes and passing a high tension low
intensity current between said electrodes.  
  
30. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1925: Nagaoka
sees Gold from Tungsten electrodes w. electric arcs in oil World
famous Japanese physicist Preliminary note on the transmutation
of Mercury into Gold Hantaro Nagaoka Nature 116 pp. 95 - 96
(1925) The [high-current electric arc] experimental procedure
here sketched cannot be looked upon as the only one for effecting
transmutation [of other elements into Gold]; probably different
processes will be developed and finally lead to industrial
enterprises  Experiments with various elements may lead to
different transmutations, which will be of significance to science
and industry. Meagre as is the result, I wish to invite the
attention of those interested in the subject so that they may
repeat the experiment with more powerful means than are available
in the Far East. Prof. Hantaro Nagaoka in Letters to the Editor
Nature July 18, 1925  
  
31 Unlike, the comparatively unknown Wendt & Irion team at the
U. of Chicago, Nagaoka was a world-renowned physicist and one of
the most preeminent scientists in Japan when he began his
high-current discharge transmutation experiments in September
1924/ For an appreciation of Hantaros high scientific stature,
please see Wikipedia article:   
[**http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hantaro\_Nagaoka**](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hantaro_Nagaoka)  
Nagaoka was contemporary competitor of Ernest Rutherford;
Hantaros Saturn model of the atom was only competing model
cited by Rutherford in his seminal 1911 paper on atomic nuclei.
Given the very international character of science even at that
time, it is very likely that Nagaoka was aware of worldwide
controversy swirling around Wendt & Irions exploding wire
experiments and of Rutherford's short but devastating critical
attack on them in Nature. It is also quite likely that Hantaro was
aware of Robert Millikans well-publicized views on subject of
triggering transmutations with electric arcs (note: Millikan had
just won a Nobel prize in physics). Lastly, he must have known
about Miethe & Stammreichs work in Germany; they claimed to
have changed Mercury into Gold in a high-voltage Mercury vapor
lamp, The reported transmutation of Mercury into Gold, Nature
114 pp. 197 - 198 (1924) Please see: Preliminary note on the
transmutation of Mercury into Gold, H. Nagaoka, Nature 116 pp. 95
-96 (18 July 1925) Available for purchase on Nature archives at:   
[**http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v116/n2907/abs/116095a0.html**](http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v116/n2907/abs/116095a0.html)  
Abstract: "The experiment on the transmutation of mercury was
begun in September 1924, with the assistance of Messrs. Y.
Sugiura, T. Asada and T. Machida. The main object was to ascertain
if the view which we expressed in NATURE of March 29, 1924, can be
realised by applying an intense electric field to mercury atoms.
Another object was to find if the radio- active changes can be
accelerated by artificial means. From the outset it was clear that
a field of many million volts/cm. is necessary for the purpose.
From our observation on the Stark effect in arcs of different
metals (Jap. Journ. Phys., vol. 3, pp. 45 73) we found that with
silver globules the field in a narrow space very near the metal
was nearly 2 A -105 volts/cm. with terminal voltage of about 140.
The presence of such an intense field indicated the possibility of
obtaining the desired strength of the field for transmutation, if
sufficient terminal voltage be applied. Though the above ratio of
magnification would be diminished with high voltage, the
experiment was thought worth trying, even if we could not effect
the transmutation with the apparatus at hand." Historical
perspective: over 100 years of data 1925: Nagaoka sees Gold from
Tungsten electrodes w. electric arcs in oil  
  
32. Essence of Prof. Nagaokas experiments: In the simplest terms:
Prof. Nagaoka created a powerful electric arc discharge between a
spark gap comprising two metallic, Thorium-oxide-free Tungsten (W)
electrodes (supplied by Tokyo Electric Company) bathed in a
dielectric liquid paraffin (today referred to as transformer
oil; general formula CnH2n+2) that was interlaced with liquid
native Mercury (Hg). Depending on experiment, arcing between
Tungsten electrodes in oil was continued for 4 - 15 hours until,
quoting,   the oil and mercury were mixed into a black pasty
mass. Please note that Mercury readily forms amalgams with many
different metals, including Gold (Au) and Tungsten (W). Small
flecks of Gold were sometimes quite visible to the naked eye in
black masses produced at the end of a given experiment. They
also noted that, The Gold obtained from Mercury seems to be
mostly adsorbed to Carbon.. Microscopic assays were conducted by,
heating small pieces of glass with the Carbon, to form a
so-called Ruby glass that can be used to infer the presence of
gold colloids from visual cues very apparent under a microscope.
Critics complained about the possibility that the Gold observed
was some sort of contamination. Responding to critics, Nagaoka
et al. further purified literally everything they could think of
and also made certain that the lab environs were squeaky clean;
they still kept seeing anomalous Gold. Also, in some experiments
they also observed, a minute quantity of white metal. Two years
later in 1926, Nagaoka reported to Scientific American that they
had finally been able to identify the white metal --- it was
Platinum (Pt) Fig. 1  Apparatus for the electric discharge H.
Nagaoka, Nature July 18, 1925 Historical perspective: over 100
years of data 1925: Nagaoka sees Gold from Tungsten electrodes w.
electric arcs in oil  
  
33. All of the ingredients for LENRs to occur were in fact
present: hydride-forming metal found therein was Tungsten (sadly,
Nagaoka was unaware that Mercury was more-or-less a red herring);
which was in contact with abundant Hydrogen (protons) in
transformer oil (CnH2n+2); the Born-Oppenheimer approximation
broke-down on surfaces of electrodes; and finally, there were
large non-equilibrium fluxes of charged particles --- electrons in
the high-current arc discharges. Unbeknownst to Nagaoka, his
high-current arcs probably also produced small amounts of
fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, and perhaps even a little graphene.
ULM neutron production rates via W-L weak interaction could have
been quite substantial in his high-electric-current-driven
experimental system because of very large inputs of electrical
energy. What could have happened in Nagaokas experiments was that
Tungsten-seed, ULM neutron-catalyzed nucleosynthetic networks
spontaneously formed. What follows is but one example of an
energetically favorable network pathway that could produce
detectable amounts of the only stable Gold isotope, 197Au, within
~4 hours (shortest arc discharge period after which Au was
observed). Other alternative viable LENR pathways can produce
unstable Gold isotopes, e.g., 198Au with half-life = 2.7 days and
199Au with HL = 3.1 days (both would be around for a time at end
of a successful experiment). One possible 74W180-target LENR
network pathway that could produce Pt and Au in as little time as
4-5 hrs follows: 74W-186 Stable 28.4% 76Os-192 Stable 41% 79Au-197
Stable 100% 74W-187 HL = 23.7 hrs 76Os-193 HL = 1.3 days 74W-188
HL = 69.8 days 76Os-194 HL = 6.0 yrs 74W-189 HL = 11.6 min
76Os-195 HL = 6.5 min 74W-190 HL = 30 min 77Ir-195 HL = 2.5 hrs
74W-191 HL = 20 sec 77Ir-196 HL = 52 sec 74W-192 HL = 10 sec
78Pt-196 Stable 25.3% 75Re-192 HL = 16 sec 78Pt-197 HL = 19.9 hrs
5.6 7.1 5.3 2.0 5.8 β- 4.2 4.2 0.7 0.7 5.5 6.8 4.9 6.9 4.9 6.6 2.1
3.2 5.9 End at Gold Note: stable elements (incl. % natural
abundance) and half-lives of unstable isotopes are shown; green
arrows connecting boxes denote capture of an LENR neutron; blue
connecting arrows denote beta decays; energetic Q- values for
neutron captures or beta decays are also provided; note that ALL
Q-values are substantially positive, thus this particular
nucleosynthetic pathway is very energetically favorable for
producing Platinum and Gold 3.2 2.0 β- Historical perspective:
over 100 years of data 1925: Nagaoka sees Gold from Tungsten
electrodes w. electric arcs in oil Begin Which LENR network could
have produced Gold or Platinum from a Tungsten target?  
  
34. Re other possibly anomalous sources of Gold: Occurrence of
Platinum, Palladium, and Gold in pine needles of Pinus pinea from
the city of Palermo (Italy) G. Dongarra, D. Varrica, and G.
Sabatino Applied Geochemistry 18 pp. 109-116 (2003) Quoting:
Preliminary data on the presence of Pt, Pd and Au in airborne
particulate matter from the urban area of Palermo (Sicily, Italy)
are presented. They were obtained by analysing 40 samples of pine
needles (Pinus pinea L.) collected in and around the city.
Observed concentrations range from 1 to 102 μg/kg for Pt, 1 to 45
μg/kg for Pd and 22 to 776 μg/kg for Au. Platinum and Pd
concentrations in pine needles are up to two orders of magnitude
higher than their crustal abundances. They exhibit a high
statistical correlation (R2=0.74) which suggests a common origin.
Precious metal concentrations measured within the city centre are
much higher than those occurring outside the town. The
distribution patterns of Pt and Pd in the study area are compared
to the distributions of Au and Pb. Gold is enriched at the same
sites where Pt and Pd are enriched, while Pb shows some
discrepancies. The most probable local source of all of these
elements is traffic. Average Pt and Pd emissions in the city area
are estimated to be about 136 and 273 g/a, respectively.
Discussed in Lattice presentation at URL:   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-
energy-llc-len-rs-in-catalytic-convertersjune-25-2010**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-%20energy-llc-len-rs-in-catalytic-convertersjune-25-2010)   
Nagaokas reported results were probably correct; Gold (Au) and
Platinum (Pt) could have been produced by LENRs per W-L theory:
Plausible LENR nucleosynthetic pathway shown in a previous Slide
suggests that Nagaoka et al.s claimed observations of
macroscopically visible particles of Gold in their ca. 1920s
electric arc experiments in transformer oil could very well have
been correct observations. Note that stable Gold can also be
produced via neutron capture on stable 80Hg196 which creates
unstable 80Hg197 that has a half-life of 2.7 days and decays via
electron capture into stable 79Au197. However, the natural
abundance (0.15%) of 80Hg19 initially present in Nagaoka's
mid-1920s experiments was so low that this alternative LENR
pathway cannot plausibly account for observed production of
macroscopic flecks of metallic of Au and Pt that are readily
visible to the naked human eye. Please take note of the quotation
from Prof. Nagaoka reproduced on earlier Slide. In saying what he
said, Hantaro clearly believed that some sort of commercial
transmutation technology would eventually be developed at some
point in the future. Thus, in our opinion not only was he a
humble, brilliant scientist; he was also a rather bold visionary
thinker --- truly a man far ahead of his own time. In the present
era it is very possible that minute quantities of Gold are
actually being produced in automobile catalytic converters via the
transmutation of some Platinum present in the converters: at
right, please see citation to a 2003 paper in Applied Geochemistry
and URL to yet another Lattice SlideShare presentation dated June
25, 2010 Historical perspective: over 100 years of data Final
remarks re Nagaoka; today Au is produced in catalytic converters  
  
35. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1927:
Millikans Caltech PhD student observed Pb → Hg and Bi → Tl
Comment: in Widom-Larsen condensed matter LENR nucleosynthetic
network shown earlier, unstable isotopes of Lead and Bismuth will
spontaneously transmute into unstable isotopes of Mercury and
Thallium, respectively, which could be detected spectroscopically.
This was observed and reported by Lars Thomassen in experimental
work conducted for his PhD at Caltech under Millikan. Note that
Thomassen cites Nagaoka (who was a famous physicist) but does not
cite Wendt & Irion; credibility of their exploding wire work
in 1922 had already been destroyed by Rutherford with his attack
published in Nature. Transmutation of elements L. Thomassen
Physical Review 33 pp. 229 - 238 (1929)   
[**http://authors.library.caltech.edu/2524/1/THOpr29.pdf**](http://authors.library.caltech.edu/2524/1/THOpr29.pdf)  
Comment re thesis: Please note Thomassens frequent complaints
about experimentalists having great difficulty in repeating their
results in transmutation experiments; does that sort of complaint
sound familiar a la Pons & Fleischmann? See Lattice SlideShare
document discussing this work:   
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-
llcaddendum-to-may-19-2012-technical-overview1927-
caltech-experimentsmay-26-2012**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-%20llcaddendum-to-may-19-2012-technical-overview1927-%20caltech-experimentsmay-26-2012)   
Version of his thesis published in peer-reviewed journal as:
Unstable 82Pb210 Half-life = ~22.2 years Alpha decay Unstable
80Hg206 Half-life = ~8.2 minutes Lead Mercury Unstable 83Bi210
Half-life = ~5 days Unstable 81Tl206 Half-life = ~4.2 minutes
Alpha decay Bismuth Thallium LENR transmutation of Lead into other
elements was observed in experiments PhD thesis, Caltech August
1927 [22 pages]:   
[**http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/843/1/Thomassen\_l\_1927.pdf**](http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/843/1/Thomassen_l_1927.pdf)  
36. 1932: Chadwick confirms existence of Rutherfords predicted
neutron It is evident that we must either relinquish the
application of the conservation of energy and momentum in these
collisions or adopt another hypothesis about the nature of the
radiation. If we suppose that the radiation is not a quantum
radiation, but consists of particles of mass very nearly equal to
that of the proton, all the difficulties connected with the
collisions disappear, both with regard to their frequency and to
the energy transfer to different masses. In order to explain the
great penetrating power of the radiation we must further assume
that the particle has no net charge. We may suppose it to consist
of a proton and an electron in close combination, the neutron as
discussed by Rutherford in his Bakerian Lecture of 1920. Above
quoted from paper cited below; received Nobel Prize in physics for
this work in 1936 The existence of a neutron J. Chadwick Proc.
Roy. Soc. A 136 pp. 692 - 708 (1932)   
[**http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/136/830/692.full.pdf**](http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/136/830/692.full.pdf)  
Quoting further: The properties of penetrating radiation emitted
from Beryllium (and Boron) when bombarded by the α-particles of
Polonium have been examined. It is concluded that the radiation
consists, not of quanta as hitherto supposed, but of neutrons,
particles of mass 1, and charge 0. Evidence is given to show that
the mass of the neutron is probably between 1.005 and 1.008 
Although there is certain evidence for the emission of neutrons
only in two cases of nuclear transformations, we must nevertheless
suppose that the neutron is a common constituent of atomic nuclei
 It is  possible to suppose that the neutron is an elementary
particle. This view has little to recommend it at present 
Neutral nuclear particle had been boldly conjectured by Rutherford
back in 1920  
  
37. 1933: at his pinnacle, Rutherford dismisses commercial
transmutation Anyone who expects a source of power from the
transformation of the atom is talking moonshine. Variations of
this comment made many times by Rutherford during 1930s; died
suddenly in 1937 at age 66 Epilogue: fission discovered (1939);
first use of atomic weapons (1945); first commercial reactor
(1955) We might in these processes obtain very much more energy
than the proton supplied, but on the average we could not expect
to obtain energy in this way. It was a very poor and inefficient
way of producing energy, and anyone who looked for a source of
power in the transformation of the atoms was talking moonshine.
But the subject was scientifically interesting because it gave
insight into the atoms. The London Times, Sept. 12, 1933, quoted
from talk given by Rutherford at a meeting of the British
Association for the Advancement of Science  
  
38. Historical perspective: over 100 years of data 1934: Fermi
published beta decay theory in which neutrinos are invoked
Versuch einer theorie der β-strahlen. I Googlish translation of
German abstract: A quantitative theory of β-decay is proposed, in
which one assumes the existence of the neutrino, and treated the
emission of electrons and neutrinos from a core in β-decay with a
similar method as in the emission of a photon from an excited atom
of radiation theory. Formulas for the service life and for the
shape of the emitted β-continuous radiation spectrum can be
derived and compared with observations. Epilogue: Salam, Glashow,
and Weinberg published electroweak theory (1960s); eventually
confirmed experimentally (1980s) Versuch einer Theorie der
β-Strahlen. I Enrico Fermi Zeitschrift fur Physik 88 pp. 161-177
(1934) In 1938, he received Nobel prize in physics for work on
induced radioactivity & discovery of transuranic elements
Comment: in Fermis theory, the neutron conceptually became an
elementary particle (instead of an electron tightly-bound to a
proton located inside a nucleus proper). The idea of an inverse
beta decay electron capture e + p  n + ν process occurring
outside of a nucleus in Nature was first discussed by Fred Hoyle
(MNRAS 106 pp. 343 - 383, 1946) in connection with theoretical
work on collapsing stars. Fast forward to 1990s: several LENR
researchers (e.g., Mizuno) speculated that e + p neutron
production could be occurring in electrolytic chemical cells. In a
2005 arXiv preprint, Widom & Larsen published LENR theory that
integrated many-body collective effects with modern electroweak
theory under umbrella of the Standard Model  
  
39. 1935 to 1980s: most experimental work on LENR transmutations
stops ? What happened during this time? Why did electric arc
transmutation research just stop? Was it problems with
reproducibility? Comment: it is very puzzling why this seemingly
fruitful line of inquiry involving electric-arc- driven
transmutations seems to have more-or-less died-out worldwide by
the time Chadwick experimentally verified the Rutherford neutrons
existence in 1932. After that date, only a handful of researchers
such as Fritz Paneth continued the work. Oddly, it also does not
appear that anyone else ever tried to exactly duplicate Nagaokas
astounding experiments. However, at around that time there were
very well-publicized failures to replicate Miethe &
Stammreichs Gold experiments that were extensively chronicled in
Scientific American. Interestingly, Miethes experimental
apparatus consisted of Mercury arc lamps with Tungsten electrodes
inside well-evacuated quartz tubes; no transformer oil was present
in those electric arc experiments. In hindsight, perhaps Nagaokas
decision to use oil was exceedingly fortuitous: by arcing in
transformer oil, he inadvertently guaranteed that his experimental
apparatus contained huge quantities of hydrogen (protons) for
making neutrons via LENRs.  
  
40. 1989: Pons & Fleischmann claim cold fusion occurs in
chemical cells D+D fusion theory was wrong; excess heat results
were irreproducible back then Tragic outcome was very similar to
Wendt & Irions controversy with Rutherford back in 1922 - 23
Comment: unfortunately for Pons & Fleischmann, their claimed
excess heat production effects were very poorly reproducible in
1989-1990 because they were completely wrong about their D+D
fusion hypothesis and had no knowledge whatsoever of what are now
called the fields of nanotechnology and plasmonics. Indeed,
certain recent technical knowledge derived from nanotechnology,
plasmonics, and advanced materials science that is crucial to
being able to fabricate reproducible, well-performing LENR devices
did not even exist in 1989, or even in the mid- to late 1990s. In
our opinion, there is no way condensed matter LENRs could have
been truly experimentally reproducible prior to the past several
years. Commercialization of technology should now be feasible with
the help of new Widom-Larsen theory and nanotech.
Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium Martin
Fleischmann and Stanley Pons Journal of Electroanalytical
Chemistry 261 pp. 301 - 309 (1989)  
  
41. Skepticism is reminiscent of Rutherfords dismissal of nuclear
power in 1930s Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. Epigram
by Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr in the January 1849 issue of his
journal Les Guepes (The Wasps) The idea of producing useful
energy from room temperature nuclear reactions is an aberration.
Prof. John Huizenga, well-respected chemist and physicist,
referring to cold fusion in his 1993 book, Cold fusion --- The
scientific fiasco of the century Oxford University Press (2007)
Wiley  Interscience (2007) Historical perspective: over 100 years
of data 1990s: Huizenga personally believed that LENRs were very
dubious.  
43. Region of neutron-catalyzed transmutation pathways discussed
herein LENR transmutation processes typically proceed from left to
right along rows in the Periodic Table of elements
Neutron-catalyzed LENR networks Map of all presently known stable
and unstable isotopes of elements In this presentation, we will be
discussing a theoretical LENR neutron-catalyzed nucleosynthetic
network (yellow arrow) that can begin in the region of Tungsten
(W) targets and, depending on the size and duration of neutron
fluxes per Widom-Larsen theory, can potentially extend to heavier,
higher-Z elements as far as Lead (Pb) and Bismuth (83Bi209) March
7, 2013    
  
44. Starting with Tungsten targets can reach Lead (Pb) and Bismuth
(83Bi209) Neutron-catalyzed LENR networks Periodic table of
elements: LENR transmutation processes traverse rows LENR
transmutation network pathway  
  
45. Neutron-catalyzed LENR networks Example: network makes
Platinum, Gold, Mercury, Lead, and Bismuth. We will now examine a
hypothetical LENR transmutation network that can begin with
neutron captures on Tungsten (W) as well as other intermediate
targets. Explanatory legend for network diagrams appears on the
next slide 74W180-seed network includes Mercury (Hg); if
sufficiently high neutron fluxes are maintained for enough time,
can even reach Bismuth (Bi) under optimal conditions. While
unstable intermediate network products undergo nuclear decays,
their half- lives are generally short (especially those that are
more neutron-rich); this network does not produce significant
amounts of dangerous long-lived radioactive isotopes. According to
the WLT, in condensed matter systems LENRs occur in many tiny nm-
to micron-scale surface sites or patches that only exist for
several hundred nanoseconds before they die; such sites can form
and re-form spontaneously. Need input energy to make ultra cold
neutrons that catalyze LENR transmutations. Herein, we will
discuss new Hg isotopic data of Mead et al. indicating that
portions of this nucleosynthetic network may be occurring inside
compact fluorescent lights  
  
46. Example: network makes Platinum, Gold, Mercury, Lead, and
Bismuth Neutron capture and nuclear decay processes: ULM neutron
captures proceed from left to right except for upper-left corner;
Q-value of capture reaction (MeV) in green either above or below
horizontal arrow. Beta- (β-) decays proceed from top to bottom;
denoted with bright blue vertical arrow pointing down with Q-value
(MeV) in blue either to left or right; beta+ (β+) decays are
denoted with yellow arrow pointing upward to row above Alpha
decays, indicated with orange arrows, proceed mostly from right to
left at an angle with Q-value (MeV) shown in orange located on
either side of the process arrow. Electron captures (e.c.)
indicated by purple vertical arrow; Q-value (MeV) to left or
right. Note: to reduce visual clutter in the network diagram,
gamma emissions (converted to infrared photons by heavy e-\*
electrons) are not shown; similarly, except where specifically
listed because a given branch cross-section is significant,
beta-delayed decays also generally not shown; BR means branching
ratio if >1 decay alternative Color coded half-lives: When
known, half-lives shown as HL = xx. Stable and quasi-stable
isotopes (i.e., those with half-lives > or equal to 107 years)
indicated by green boxes; isotopes with half-lives < 107 but
> than or equal to 103 years indicated by light blue; those
with half-lives < than 103 years but > or equal to 1 day are
denoted by purplish boxes; half-lives of < 1 day in yellow;
with regard to half-life, notation ? nm means isotope has been
verified by HL has not been measured Measured natural terrestrial
abundances for stable isotopes: Indicated with % symbol; note that
83Bi209 = 100% (essentially ~stable with half-life = 1.9 x 1019
yrs); 82Pb-205 ~stable with HL= 1.5 x107 yrs Legend:  
  
47.  Please note: once created, the process of capturing an
LENR ULM neutron on a nearby atom occurs very quickly; on the
order of picoseconds, i.e., 0.000000000001 sec., i.e., 10-12 sec,
which is much faster than any of the various nuclear decays found
in this particular LENR network. Moreover, in case of condensed
matter LENRs, while their neutron production rates are probably
significantly lower than the r-process, LENR neutron capture
cross-sections are vastly higher than those in stellar
environments; on balance its essentially a wash, so LENRs can
effectively mimic the r-process. Thus, isotopes in LENRs can
potentially capture additional neutrons (i.e., become more
neutron-rich isotopes of the same element) before beta decay
transmutes them into other higher-Z elements found in the Periodic
Table. This is why the hot astrophysical r-process can make
heavier elements than the s-process (i.e., go beyond Bismuth):
with much higher produced neutron fluxes, the r-process can
successfully traverse and bridge key regions of very short-lived
isotopes that are found in ultra-neutron-rich, high-Z reaches of
vast nuclear isotopic landscape Network may potentially continue
upward to even higher values of A; This depends on ULM neutron
flux in cm2/sec 75Re-185 Stable 37.4% 75Re-186 HL = 3.7 days
76Os-186 Stable 1.58% 6.2 6.3 Increasing values of Z 73Ta-181
Stable 99.9+% 73Ta-182 HL = 114 days 73Ta-184 HL = 8.6 hrs
73Ta-185 HL = 49.3 min 7.4 6.9 5.6 74W-180 Stable 0.12% 74W-182
Stable 26.5% 74W-183 Stable 14.3 % 74W-184 Stable 30.6% 74W-185 HL
= 75.1 days 8.1 6.2 5.8 73Ta-183 HL = 5.1 days 74W-186 Stable
28.4% Increasing values of A 6.1 6.7 7.4 7.2 5.5 7.4 1.8 1.1 2.9
2.0 5.4 73Ta-186 HL = 10.5 min 3.9 6.2 433 keV 1.1 BR 92.5% 7.2
74W-181 HL = 121 days ε 188 keV BR = 100% ε 579 keV BR = 7.5%
Start with stable Tungsten targets of pure W metal Alternatively,
one could start with 73Ta181 target Tungsten It should also be
noted that all of the many atoms located within a 3-D region of
space that encompasses a given ULM neutrons spatially extended
DeBroglie wave function (whose dimensions can range from 2 nm to
100 microns) will compete with each other to capture such
neutrons. ULM neutron capture is thus a decidedly many-body
scattering process, not few- body scattering such as that which
characterizes capture of neutrons at thermal energies in condensed
matter in which the DeBroglie wave function of a thermal neutron
is on the order of ~ 2 Angstroms. This explains why vast majority
of produced neutrons are captured locally and are only rarely
detected at any energies during course of LENR experiments; it
also clearly explains why human-lethal MeV-energy neutron fluxes
are characteristically not produced in condensed matter LENR
systems.  
  
48.  75Re-188 HL = 17 hrs 76Os-188 Stable 13.3% 6.8 5.9
74W-187 HL = 23.7 hrs 75Re-187 ~Stable 1010 yrs ULM Neutron
Capture Ends on Ta Dotted green arrow denotes ULMN capture
products coming from lower values of A 75Re-190 HL = 3.2 min
75Re-189 HL = 1 day 76Os-189 Stable 16.1% 76Os-191 HL = 15.4 days
76Os-190 Stable 26.4% 76Os-192 ~Stable 41.0% 76Os-193 HL = 1.3
days 76Os-194 HL = 6.0 yrs 77Ir-191 Stable 37.3% 77Ir-193 Stable
62.7% 77Ir-194 HL = 19.3 hrs 78Pt-192 Stable 0.79% 78Pt-193 HL =
51 yrs 78Pt-194 Stable 32.9% 4.9 7.0 5.7 6.9 8.0 6.2 6.3 8.4 6.1
1.8 1.6 Increasing values of A Increasing values of Z Network may
potentially continue upward to even higher values of A; This
depends on ULM neutron flux in cm2/sec 73Ta-187 HL = 1.7 min
75Re-192 HL = 16 sec 75Re-193 HL = 30 sec 75Re-194 H L = 2 sec
74W-190 HL = 30 min 74W-191 HL = 20 sec 6.3 5.5 6.2 7.4 5.1
74W-189 HL = 11.6 min 74W-188 HL = 69.8 days 76Os-187 Stable 1.6%
75Re-191 HL = 9.8 min ULM Neutron Capture Ends on W ULM Neutron
Capture Ends on Re 3.1 6.9 4.9 5.4 6.7 5.3 7.8 5.9 5.8 7.6 5.6 7.1
5.3 7.8 6.1 1.5 BR 95.1% 1.0 3.1 2.1 4.2 3.1 313 keV BR 100% 2..1
73Ta-189 HL = 3 sec 73Ta-190 HL= 3 x 102 msec 73Ta-188 HL = 20 sec
4.9 3.7 5.6 74W-192 HL = 10 sec ε 1..1 BR = 4.9% 77Ir-192 HL =
73.8 days 1.1 ε 57 keV BR = 100% 1.3 349 keV 2.5 1.3 3.2 2.1 4.9
97 keV 2.2 7.2 6.1 4.9 6.7 Produce Platinum As shown in these
network charts, more neutron-rich, unstable beta-decaying isotopes
tend to have more energetic decays and shorter half-lives.
Electric current-driven LENR ULM neutron production and capture
processes can occur at much faster rates than decay rates of
beta-/e.c.-unstable isotopes in this network. Thus, if local ULM
neutron production rates in given LENR patch are high enough,
large differences in rates of beta decay vs. neutron capture
processes means that largish populations of unstable, very
neutron-rich isotopes can accumulate locally during 300 nanosec
lifetime of an LENR-active patch, prior to its being destroyed.  
  
49.  6Os-196 HL = 34.8 min 77Ir-196 HL = 52 sec 78Pt-196
Stable 25.3% 6.7 76Os-195 HL = 6.5 min 77Ir-195 HL = 2.5 hrs
Dotted green arrow denotes ULMN capture products coming from lower
values of A 77Ir-199 HL = 20 sec 77Ir-198 HL = 8 sec 78Pt-197 HL =
19.9 hrs 78Pt-199 HL = 30.8 min 78Pt-198 Stable 7.2% 78Pt-200 HL =
13 hrs 79Au-197 Stable 100% 79Au-199 HL = 3.1 days 79Au-200 HL =
48 min 79Au-201 HL = 27 min 5.8 6.9 5.6 6.9 5.9 7.6 5.6 7.3 5.2
6.9 6.5 7.6 6.3 7.2 6.1 6.8 2.0 1.3 0.6 1.7 666 keV 2.7 1.8
Increasing values of A Increasing values of Z Network may
potentially continue upward to even higher values of A; This
depends on ULM neutron flux in cm2/sec 78Pt-195 Stable 33.8% ULM
Neutron Capture Ends on Ir 5.3 7.2 6.1 78Pt-202 HL = 1.9 days
79Au-202 HL = 28.8 sec ULM Neutron Capture Ends on Os 80Hg-198
Stable 9.8% 80Hg-199 Stable 16.9% 80Hg-201 Stable 13.2% 80Hg-200
Stable 23.1% 80Hg-202 Stable 29.9% 79Au-198 HL = 2.7 days 78Pt-201
HL = 2.5 min 1.4 452 keV 719 keV 1.3 2.2 3.0 77Ir-197 HL = 5.8 min
2.2 4.1 3.0 1.2 1.1 3.2 6.7 8.0 6.2 7.8 6.0 7.9 ULM Neutron
Capture Ends on Pt 80Hg-196 Stable 0.15% 80Hg-197 HL = 2.7 days ε
600 keV BR = 100% 6.8 8.5 Please note that: Q-value for neutron
capture on a given beta-unstable isotope is often larger than the
Q-value for the alternative β- decay pathway, so in addition to
being a faster process than beta decay it can also be
energetically more favorable. This can also contribute to creating
fleeting yet substantial local populations of short-lived,
neutron-rich isotopes. There is indirect experimental evidence
that such neutron-rich isotopes can be produced in complex ULM
neutron-catalyzed LENR nucleosynthetic (transmutation) networks
that set-up and operate during brief lifetime of an LENR-active
patch; see Carbon-seed network on Slides # 11 - 12 and esp. on
Slide #55 in:  
[**http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewcarbon-seed-lenr-networkssept-3-2009**](http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llctechnical-overviewcarbon-seed-lenr-networkssept-3-2009)  
Thermal Neutron Capture Cross-section (barns) 105 not available
0.017 2.1 x 103 <60 <60 4.9 Produce Gold and Mercury  
  
50. Neutron-catalyzed LENR networks Example: network makes
Platinum, Gold, Mercury, Lead, and Bismuth 79Au-204 HL = 39.8 sec
80Hg-204 Stable 6.9% 81Tl-204 HL=3.8 yrs 82Pb-204 Stable 1.4% 5.7
7.5 81Tl-203 Stable 29.5% Dotted green arrow denotes ULMN capture
products coming from lower values of A 80Hg-206 HL = 8.2 min
80Hg-205 HL = 5.2 min 80Hg-207 HL = 2.8 min 81Tl-205 Stable 70.5%
81Tl-207 HL = 4.8 min 81Tl-206 HL = 4.2 min 81Tl-208 HL = 3.1 min
81Tl-209 HL = 2.2 min 81Tl-210 HL = 1.3 min 82Pb-205 HL= 1.5 x 107
yrs 82Pb-207 Stable 22.1% 82Pb-206 Stable 24.1% 82Pb-208 Stable
52.4% 83Bi-209 ~Stable 100% 2.1 5.7 6.7 3.3 6.7 7.6 6.5 6.9 3.8
5.0 3.7 6.7 8.1 6.7 7.4 3.9 5.2 3.8 4.6 5.1 1.3 644 keV Increasing
values of A Increasing values of Z Network may potentially
continue upward to even higher values of A; This depends on ULM
neutron flux in cm2/sec 80Hg-208 HL = 42 min ULM Neutron Capture
Ends on Au ULM Neutron Capture Ends on Hg 6.8 6.0 80Hg-203 HL=
46.6 days 82Pb-209 HL = 3.3 hrs 82Pb-210 HL= 22.2 yrs 6.1 79Au-205
HL = 31 sec 80Hg-209 HL = 37 sec 80Hg-210 HL = 10 min 492 keV 344
keV BR 2.9% ε 344 keV BR = 97.1% 79Au-203 HL= 53 sec 4.9 ε 51 keV
BR = 100% 63 keV BR 99.9% 1.4 1.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 3.9 3.5 84Po-210 HL=
138 days 83Bi-210 HL= 5 days 1.2 BR 99.9% 1.5 1.3 4.8 3.7 5.3 4.1
4.9 3.3 4.8 Beginning with target starting nuclei upon which ULM
neutron captures are initiated, complex, very dynamically changing
LENR nucleosynthetic networks are established in tiny micron-scale
LENR-active patches. These ULM neutron-catalyzed LENR networks
exist for lifetimes of the particular patches in which they were
created; except for any still-decaying transmutation products that
may linger, such networks typically die along with the
LENR-active patch that originally gave birth to them. Target
nuclei for such networks can comprise any atoms in a substrate
underlying an LENR-active patch and/or include atoms located
nearby in various types of surface nanoparticles or nanostructures
electromagnetically connected to a patch. Thermal Neutron Capture
Cross-section ( barns) 80Hg-203 = n.a. 80Hg-204 = 0.40 Produce
Bismuth Produce Lead  
  
51. False-color image of surface plasmon excitation on substrate
Credit: Martin van Exter, Leiden Univ. Source:
http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/~exter/research.htm For copy of
informative Nature article by Exter re quantum entanglement of
surface plasmons, see:   
[**http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/~exter/articles/nature.pdf**](http://www.molphys.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eexter/articles/nature.pdf)  
Overview: compact fluorescent lights  
  
52. Overview: compact fluorescent lights Tungsten (W) electrode
Credit: Edison Tech Center Commercial arc tube lighting technology
goes way back to 1895  
  
53. Overview: compact fluorescent lights Credit: Edison Tech
Center Historical timeline of various electric lighting
technologies since 1800  
  
54. Overview: compact fluorescent lights Fluorescent lights come
in straight tubes, curves, and spirals Source:   
[**http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent\_lamp**](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_lamp)  
Fluorescent lamp tube: Is filled with a gas containing low
pressure mercury vapor and argon, xenon, neon, or krypton. The
pressure inside the lamp is around 0.3% of atmospheric pressure.
The inner surface of the lamp is coated with a fluorescent (and
often slightly phosphorescent) coating made of varying blends of
metallic and rare-earth phosphor salts. The lamp's electrodes are
typically made of coiled tungsten and usually referred to as
cathodes because of their prime function of emitting electrons.
For this, they are coated with a mixture of barium, strontium and
calcium oxides chosen to have a low thermionic emission
temperature. Fluorescent lamp tubes are typically straight and
range in length from about 100 millimeters (3.9 in) for miniature
lamps, to 2.43 meters (8.0 ft) for high-output lamps. Some lamps
have the tube bent into a circle, used for table lamps or other
places where a more compact light source is desired. Larger
U-shaped lamps are used to provide the same amount of light in a
more compact area, and are used for special architectural
purposes. Light-emitting phosphors are applied as a paint-like
coating to the inside of the tube. The organic solvents are
allowed to evaporate, and then the tube is heated to nearly the
melting point of glass to drive off remaining organic compounds
and fuse the coating to the lamp tube. Careful control of the
grain size of the suspended phosphors is necessary; large grains,
35 micrometers or larger, lead to weak grainy coatings, whereas
too many small particles 1 or 2 micrometers or smaller leads to
poor light maintenance and efficiency. Most phosphors perform best
with a particle size around 10 micrometers. The coating must be
thick enough to capture all the ultraviolet light produced by the
mercury arc, but not so thick that the phosphor coating absorbs
too much visible light. The first phosphors were synthetic
versions of naturally occurring fluorescent minerals, with small
amounts of metals added as activators. Later other compounds were
discovered, allowing differing colors of lamps to be made.
Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs): Have several small-diameter
tubes joined in a bundle of two, four, or six, or a small diameter
tube coiled into a spiral, to provide a high amount of light
output in little volume.  
  
55. Overview: compact fluorescent lights Details of common
straight fluorescent tubes used for many decades Image credit:
Edison Tech Center See very informative Edison Tech Center YouTube
video at   
[**http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player\_embedded&v=z55566ep0Hg**](http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z55566ep0Hg)  
  
56. Overview: compact fluorescent lights Illustrates key details
of fluorescent tube start-up process sequence Image credit: Edison
Tech Center at   
[**http://www.edisontechcenter.org/Fluorescent.html**](http://www.edisontechcenter.org/Fluorescent.html)  
Note: both electrodes composed of Tungsten (W) ; hot lamp has
ionized Argon gas and vaporized Mercury When excited, ionized
Mercury emits UV photons; phosphors absorb UV and re-radiate
visible photons in various colors  
  
61. LENRs can mimic chemical fractionation W-L posit chemical and
nuclear processes coexist in many systems LENRs versus chemical
fractionation explanations for anomalous isotopic shifts Before
proceeding further, let it be crystal clear to readers exactly
what we are and are not saying here: We are not asserting that the
existing chemical fractionation paradigm fails to adequately
explain most reported isotope anomalies with respect to
statistically significant deviations from natural abundances ---
indeed, it may well effectively and accurately explain the vast
majority of them. We are saying that presently published
literature does contain a significant subset comprising many cases
such as Mead et al. (2013) in which a chemical fractionation
paradigm must be pushed very, very hard (which includes use of
various ad hoc constructs) to explain certain otherwise
inexplicable isotope anomalies; paradigm is being overly stretched
to be able to comfortably accommodate anomalous data. We are
suggesting that when confronted with otherwise totally
inexplicable isotopic or elemental data, it may be fruitful for
researchers to reexamine such data through the conceptual lens of
the LENR paradigm to see if invoking nuclear transmutation leads
to a deeper, better understanding of otherwise perplexing results.
In some instances, LENRs may illuminate; in others not --- but we
should examine anyway.  
  
62. Chemical fractionation paradigm assumes that no nuclear
processes are present. For ~ 60 years, a body of theory has been
developed and articulated to explain progressively increasing
numbers of stable isotope anomalies observed in a vast array of
mass spectroscopic data obtained from many different types of
natural and experimental, abiological and biological, systems.
Central ideas in chemical fractionation theory embody
equilibrium and irreversible, mass-dependent and mass-independent,
chemical processes that are claimed to separate isotopes, thus
explaining the reported anomalies. Although not explicitly
acknowledged by fractionation theorists, an intrinsic fundamental
assumption underlying all of this theory and interpretation of
data is that no nucleosynthetic processes are occurring anywhere
in any of these systems, at any time, that are capable of altering
isotope ratios and/or producing new mixtures of different elements
over time; ergo, chemistry explains everything. However, if
Widom-Larsen theory is correct, for some of this data the above
fundamental assumption may be wrong.  
  
63. Modern isotopic analysis using mass spectroscopy began back in
the 1920s. Modern isotopic chemical analysis using mass
spectrometry initially began in the early 1920s as scientists
started designing and building progressively better, more
sensitive types of instruments; the scientific community gradually
began to systematically measure and publish abundances of stable
and unstable isotopes found on earth as well as in meteoritic
materials that reached the earths surface from outer space, i.e.,
most likely from elsewhere in the solar system. Extensive
compilations of varied isotopic data eventually lead to the idea
of the natural abundances: natural abundance (NA) refers to the
isotopic composition of a given chemical element as it is
naturally found on a particular planet, e.g., earth. For a given
element composed of one or more isotopes, a weighted average of
the naturally occurring composition of these isotopes (natural
abundance) is the specific value for atomic weight that is listed
for that element in the periodic table. Note that although the
natural isotopic composition of a given chemical element can
vary from planet to planet, in theory it should remain essentially
constant over geological time (except in the case of elements
having one or more radioactive isotopes). On a given planet, the
characteristic isotopic composition of a given element, i.e., its
natural abundance, should be essentially identical everywhere. For
example, in the case of the element Copper on earth, it is
comprised of two stable isotopes that typically occur in ~
following proportions: 69% Cu-63 and 31% Cu-65. With many
terrestrial elements, one out of several stable isotopes
frequently predominates; others may be present only in minor
traces, e.g., in the case of natural Oxygen one would in principle
measure ~ 99.759% O-16; 0.0374% O-17; and 0.2039% O-18.  
  
64. By 1947 chemical fractionation theorists assumed absence of
nuclear processes. Statistically significant deviations from
natural abundances began to appear in some early isotopic data
collected by scientists; such anomalies were observed in many
different types of experimental chemical reaction systems and in
the natural environment, as well as in meteoritic materials. Given
that the observed isotopic anomalies in question obviously did not
involve material freshly processed in stars, fission reactors, or
nuclear explosions, it was readily assumed that significant
deviations from natural isotopic abundances had to be the result
of chemical processes. In the 1940-50s, early theories of
chemical fractionation were published in an effort to explain
significant anomalies from natural abundances found in some
experimental data. These early theories mainly involved
equilibrium isotope effects in reversible chemical systems and
kinetic effects of isotopes on reaction rates in irreversible
chemical systems (details will explained shortly in subsequent
slides) One example of a classic paper on abundances is: White, J.
R. and Cameron, A. E., The Natural Abundance of Isotopes of
Stable Elements, Physical Review 74 pp. 991-1000 (1948) Two
widely cited early papers on chemical isotopic fractionation are
as follows: Bigeleisen, J. and Mayer, M. J., Calculation of
equilibrium constant for isotope exchange reaction, Chem. Phys.
15 pp. 261-267 (1947) Urey, H.C., The thermodynamic properties of
isotopic substances, J. Chem. Soc. pp. 562-581 (1947)  
  
65. Mass-independent fractionation explains isotope shifts seen
in heavier elements. Since the 1950s, development of an increasing
variety of progressively improved, much less expensive, and
substantially more accurate mass spectroscopy techniques has
enabled M-S to be utilized in many different fields. A vast
quantity of reliable isotopic data has thus accumulated Since
early theories of chemical isotopic fractionation were directly
tied to mass differences between isotopes, their applicability was
generally limited to lighter elements in the Periodic Table (from
Hydrogen out through roughly Sulfur) where % differences in
relative masses are large enough to have a plausibly significant
impact on isotopic separation via some form of mass-sensitive
physico-kinetic process. Todays fractionation theories include
equilibrium and kinetic effects and mass-independent: nuclear
field shift, photochemical, and Q-M symmetry effects that attempt
to extend such concepts to accommodate much higher-mass
elements-isotopes in the Periodic Table --- even Uranium The first
reliable report of an of an isotopic anomaly that could not
plausibly be explained by simple physical processes such as
condensation or evaporation --- phase changes --- (i.e., it was
mass- independent ) was published by Clayton, R., Grossman, L.,
and Mayeda, T., A component of primitive nuclear composition in
carbonaceous meteorites, Science 182 pp. 485 - 488 (1973)
Mass-independent fractionation now utilized to explain a growing
body of anomalous, perhaps otherwise chemically inexplicable
isotopic data. For Oxygen, see Michalski, G. and Bhattacharya, S.,
Role of symmetry in the mass-independent isotope effect in
ozone, PNAS 106 pp. S493-S496 (2009)  
  
66. Definition of key term: isotopic fractionation factor = f
Isotope fractionation:  is the physical phenomenon which causes
changes in the relative abundance of isotopes due to their
differences in mass. There are two categories of isotope effects:
equilibrium and kinetic. An equilibrium isotope effect will
cause one isotope to concentrate in one component of a reversible
system that is in equilibrium. If it is the heavier isotope that
concentrates in the component of interest, then that component is
commonly referred to as enriched or heavy. If it is the light
isotope that concentrates then the component is referred to as
depleted or light. In most circumstances the heavy isotope
concentrates in the component in which the element is bound more
strongly and thus equilibrium isotope effects usually reflect
relative differences in the bond strengths of the isotopes in the
various components of the system. A kinetic isotope effect occurs
when one isotope reacts more rapidly than the other in an
irreversible system or a system in which the products are swept
away from the reactants before they have an opportunity to come to
equilibrium. Normally, the lighter isotope will react more rapidly
than the heavy isotope and thus the product will be lighter than
the reactant. It should be noted that isotope fractionation will
only occur in systems in which there is both an isotope effect and
a reaction that does not proceed to completion. Thus, even in the
presence of an isotope effect, there will be no isotope
fractionation if all the reactant goes to a single product because
all the atoms have reacted and thus the ratio of the heavy to
light isotope must be the same in the product as it was in the
reactant. The magnitude of an isotope effect is expressed as a
fractionation factor. This f is defined as the ratio of the heavy
to light isotope in the product divided by the ratio of the heavy
to light isotope in the reactant. Stated mathematically: When f
is greater than 1, the product is heavy or enriched. When it is
less than 1, the product is light or depleted. Most fractionation
factors lie between 0.9 and 1.1, but deuterium isotope effects can
result in much smaller or larger fractionation factors. A
fractionation factor of 1.050 is often referred to as a 5% isotope
effect. Source of definitions: D. Schoeller and A. Coward at :   
[**http://www.unu.unupress/food2/uid05e/uid05e0e.htm**](http://www.unu.unupress/food2/uid05e/uid05e0e.htm)

---




---